Files
Rpa_Skills/rpa-dashboard-ai/templates/contract.md
T
VasanthandClaude Opus 5.5 8951ac05a5 AI skill: SKILL.md, AI contract, scrubbed references, eval fixture (d)
- rpa-dashboard-ai/SKILL.md: trigger description and the shared question flow;
  points at the no-AI frontend.md, themes and palette instead of copying them.
- templates/contract.md: runs, review rows, endpoints and the server approve gate.
- Superbill extracts: patient names and the client name removed, every file
  carries an EXAMPLE ONLY banner. tests/test_reference_scan.py checks both skills
  for patient data, internal IPs, credentials and keys.
- tests/fixtures/d-ai-extraction and its eval entry, which runs page_check_ai
  on the built folder.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-16 15:13:55 +05:30

2.7 KiB
Raw Blame History

Dashboard data contract (AI)

Everything in the no-AI contract (../rpa-dashboard-no-ai/templates/contract.md) applies unchanged: the {event, data} envelope, its events, its actions and its rules. The AI dashboard adds extraction runs, review rows and the approve gate. These shapes come from the Superbill prototype, trimmed.

Shapes

Run       { job_id, document, status: pending|queued|running|done|failed, model,
            pages_done, pages_total, summary: { green, amber, red, blank, unscored } | null,
            approved, error }
ReviewRow { row_id, field, value, band: green|amber|red|blank|unscored,
            score, reason, verified, corrected_value }
  • summary counts the run's rows per band. It is null until the run is done.
  • score is the field's worst word score, or null when it has none.
  • corrected_value is null until a reviewer saves a value different from value.

Endpoints (web: {API_BASE} + path, JSON in and out)

Method and path What it does
GET /runs {runs: [Run]}. The page opens the first one.
GET /runs/{job_id} One Run.
GET /runs/{job_id}/review {rows: [ReviewRow]}. Empty until the run is done.
GET /runs/{job_id}/document The source document (PDF or image) shown beside the fields.
PATCH /review/{row_id} Body {corrected_value?, verified}. Patches one row, returns it.
POST /runs/{job_id}/verify-remaining Verifies every flagged row not yet verified. Returns {verified: n}.
POST /runs/{job_id}/approve The approve gate. 409 {detail} while the run isn't done or any flagged row is unverified, else 200 {ok: true}.

Errors answer with a non-2xx status and {detail: "<why>"}. The page shows detail.

Rules

  • Bands come from templates/web/bands.py and nowhere else: green ≥0.95, amber 0.90–0.95, red <0.90. A field takes its worst word score. A blank mandatory field is blank, whatever its score. No scores is unscored.
  • Flagged = every band but green. Each flagged row must be verified before approval.
  • The server enforces the gate. The page disables nothing that matters for safety: it asks, and shows the server's refusal.
  • Drafts: the page sends nothing while a reviewer types. Save sends one PATCH per edited row (with verified: true). Leaving with unsaved edits asks first.
  • Polling: while a run is queued or running, the page polls GET /runs/{job_id} every 1.5s and shows "page X of Y". It stops when the run settles.
  • Caveat: the legend always shows that colour reflects print clarity, not correctness.

templates/web/server_stub.py implements all of this on sample data, standard library only. A real backend serves the same endpoints with the same rules.